On May 11, the Cape May County Child Abduction Response Team (CART) reached a significant milestone, officially earning National CART Certification through the U.S. Department of Justice and the AMBER Alert Training & Technical Assistance Program (AATTAP).
This prestigious accomplishment is the culmination of several years of focused effort to strengthen the region's operational readiness. To achieve certification, the Cape May County team engaged in rigorous training, extensive planning, cross-agency coordination, and comprehensive policy development. Their preparedness was ultimately put to the test during a full-scale mock activation exercise designed to evaluate and refine their response capabilities under intense, real-world conditions.
The success of this initiative reflects the unwavering dedication and commitment of countless partners across Cape May County. Building a strong, effective child abduction response capability required the seamless collaboration of local law enforcement agencies, CART liaisons, emergency management personnel, search and rescue teams, and various supporting organizations. Each partner played a vital role in reaching this achievement.
Most importantly, this national certification demonstrates a unified, shared commitment to protecting children and supporting families during critical incidents where every second matters.
Congratulations to everyone who contributed their time, expertise, and professionalism to make this certification possible. The teamwork and vigilance exhibited by the Cape May County CART continue to make a profound difference for their community and serve as a model for proactive child protection.
An extensive multi-jurisdictional operation concluded successfully on February 15 with the safe recovery of a missing Robertson County, Texas, teenager in Dearborn, Michigan. The investigation, coordinated by the Robertson County Sheriff's Office alongside Homeland Security Investigations and numerous state and local agencies, resulted in the planned charging of two suspects. The successful recovery underscores the necessity of rapid, cross-border intelligence sharing when dealing with interstate incidents. Following the recovery, law enforcement issued direct guidance regarding the monitoring of youth communication platforms. This case serves as a vital example of coordinating federal, state, and local assets, including the Brazos Valley AMBER Alert Network, to resolve complex missing child scenarios crossing state lines.
Communication Platform Vulnerabilities
Following the safe recovery of the teenager, Robertson County Sheriff Bill Ruland issued a specific, public directive urging parents to closely monitor who their children communicate with and the platforms they use. This explicit statement from the lead investigative agency establishes that communication channels and third-party interactions were a central component of the disappearance. Law enforcement’s decision to pair the announcement of the recovery with a targeted warning about communication monitoring highlights an operational focus on how external contacts interact with minors prior to a disappearance.
Cross-Jurisdictional Coordination and Interoperability
The geographic trajectory of this case—originating in central Texas, involving agencies in Ohio, and concluding in Michigan—demonstrates the logistical complexity of interstate child recovery operations. The successful outcome relied entirely on the seamless integration of localized assets with federal networks. The involvement of the Tiffin Police Department in Ohio and the Dearborn Police Department in Michigan indicates a multi-state transit route that required continuous jurisdictional handoffs. Utilizing the resources of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) Criminal Investigations Division allowed local sheriffs to maintain investigative continuity beyond their immediate geographic boundaries.
Key Findings
Law enforcement explicitly identified communication platforms as a vulnerability factor, prompting a public warning from the Sheriff for parents to monitor youth communications.
The integration of federal assets, specifically Homeland Security Investigations, facilitated continuous operational tracking across state lines.
Effective resolution required interoperability between at least seven distinct local, state, and federal law enforcement entities spanning Texas, Ohio, and Michigan.
The investigation culminated in impending charges against two individuals, necessitating coordination for cross-jurisdictional prosecution.
Regional alert systems, including the Brazos Valley AMBER Alert Network, played a documented role in the multi-agency response framework.
Sources
The Initial Missing Report (Feb 6, 2026):Missing Child Alert: Police search for Jaycee Makay Rose in Robertson County, Texas (Link)
The Regional AMBER Alert (Feb 5, 2026):Amber Alert | Authorities search for missing Robertson County teenager (Link)
The Recovery Report (Feb 18, 2026):Authorities find missing Robertson County teenager (Link)
In a significant milestone that highlights years of unwavering commitment, coordination, and excellence, the North Central Colorado Regional Child Abduction Response Team (NCCR-CART) has officially achieved U.S. Department of Justice national certification. The National Criminal Justice Training Center (NCJTC) proudly recognizes this exceptional accomplishment, celebrating a team that exemplifies the highest standards in child protection.
Founded in 2014, the NCCR-CART regional alliance brings together 28 law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, and advocacy partners, all united by a single mission: to strengthen the region’s ability to respond rapidly and effectively to child abduction cases. Earning DOJ certification reflects not only their dedication to protecting children but also their ongoing investment in rigorous training, cross-jurisdictional collaboration, and steadfast preparedness.
Behind the tactical training and interagency agreements lies a deeply poignant purpose. The drive behind NCCR-CART honors the memory of 10-year-old Jessica Ridgeway. In 2012, Jessica was abducted and tragically killed while walking to school in Westminster, Colorado. Her heartbreaking case shook communities across the region and serves as a lasting, powerful reminder of exactly why this critical work matters so much.
Recently, the team demonstrated its operational readiness to honor that mission through a full-scale exercise in Westminster. Participating agencies navigated a complex, simulated child abduction scenario that tested every facet of their response capabilities. The exercise successfully utilized specialized resources, including K-9 units, digital forensics experts, and highly coordinated field operations, proving the region is ready to act at a moment's notice.
The NCJTC is profoundly honored to support dedicated teams like NCCR-CART. Committed to advancing the capabilities of Child Abduction Response Teams nationwide, the NCJTC extends its deepest congratulations to every individual and agency involved in reaching this monumental milestone. Through their hard work and vigilance, they ensure their communities are safer, and Jessica’s legacy is remembered.
By Denise Gee Peacock
Jessika Svendgard was 15 and barefoot as she ran toward the frenetic parking lot of Seattle’s King County Jail in March 2010. She had escaped captivity and repeated sexual assault, and a taxi driver had dropped her there believing it was a police station.
She told the first officer she saw her name, that she had been missing for 10 days, and that she needed to call her mother. The officer handed her his phone. No questions. No report. No pause long enough to see what stood in front of him.
Hours later, Jessika and her mother sat in a hospital anticipating a sexual assault examination. “We won’t be doing any forensic work; she’s had too many partners,” the doctor told them. Jessika was given a pamphlet on domestic violence and sent home.
Both professional oversights fed into Jessika reconnecting with Candace, a woman from a homeless youth shelter who had befriended her—and who had, Jessika now understands, been grooming her all along. “Even though Candace was responsible for taking me to the men who first abused me, the fact that she understood and seemed to feel bad about everything made me think she was the only one who got what I was going through,” Jessika recalls. “She listened. She wasn’t freaked out. She wasn’t uncomfortable.” It felt like healing.
Within weeks, Candace proposed a plan—Greyhound tickets to California, a new start—and Jessika left home again, this time pulled not by anger but by a manufactured sense of belonging.
California never materialized. Candace robbed and beat her, leaving Jessika injured, barely clothed, and alone on the street. She was taken in by a man named Baruti, who presented himself as a protector. Within days he had introduced trafficking.
That distinction, Jessika says, is one of the most misunderstood elements of trafficking: “It doesn’t always look scary. It doesn’t always look forced.”
Before any of this, the ninth grader had been a straight-A student and soccer champion in the Seattle suburb of Auburn, Washington. “Each time I was gone I felt increasingly tainted, unlovable,” she says. “It became a vicious circle.”
Telling It Like It Is
Jessika’s story is not just about surviving sex trafficking; it’s a case study in missed opportunities. Whenever she can, she tells it during child sex trafficking (CST) classes conducted by the AMBER Alert Training & Technical Assistance Program (AATTAP) of the National Criminal Justice Training Center (NCJTC)—discussing every point where more attentive or empathetic law enforcement could have helped her break free.
A few months into her trafficking, Jessika and Baruti were pulled over for questioning in a known trafficking corridor in downtown Seattle. “There I was, looking every bit of 15, traveling with a guy twice my age—and a large bag of condoms visible on the backseat,” she recalls. The officers accepted the explanation that she was his girlfriend. One even joked about the condoms. “I remember thinking, how are you not connecting this. Is this how easy it is to commit crimes in front of police officers?”
Later, she was arrested on a trespassing charge after a vice sting at a hotel and held for six hours in lingerie, without anyone offering so much as a jacket. Officers spent hours trying to determine whether she was a missing person—but because her case had never been entered into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database when her mother called to report her missing, her photo wasn’t in the system. They never identified her. Baruti was waiting outside when she was released.
The trespass paperwork she walked out with—bearing a false name—became proof of a false identity. “I’m officially 18. I’ll never be found,” she realized.
There’s no such thing as a safe runaway. It’s a missing, endangered child.
Even if a victim doesn’t want to talk to law enforcement, the advocate can take them confidentially aside and talk to them about getting resources. That is huge.
I definitely didn't feel seen. I didn't feel like anyone really cared.
What Officers Need to Understand
Blaine Phillips, a Special Agent with the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation’s Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, makes Jessika’s story a focal point of his AATTAP-NCJTC training. His core message: “There’s no such thing as a safe runaway. It’s a missing, endangered child.” Children run toward a groomer or away from abuse; either way, they are in danger the moment they leave. He frames the myth that victims “choose” prostitution just as directly: “It’s not that they’re not a child sex trafficking victim; it’s that we’re a decade late in getting to them.”
Fellow AATTAP-NCJTC instructor Heidi Chance—a former Phoenix police officer who spent more than 16 years investigating sex trafficking and has interviewed an estimated 1,000 or more victims—notes that Phoenix did not begin training officers on human trafficking until 2014. “In 1998, when I was in the police academy, I never had a class on human trafficking,” Chance says. “So you have a whole bunch of cops out there who have never learned about any of this, and the pimps are bragging that we don’t see them.”
During her classes she often plays a video of a trafficker doing exactly that to make the point hit home. Both instructors stress the psychology traffickers exploit. Many children they target come from foster care, neglect, or abuse; the trafficker may be the first person who ever showed them consistent affection—manufactured, yes, but real to the child experiencing it.
Chance puts the psychology of control starkly: “A pimp is the most reliable person you’ll ever meet. If they say they’re going to beat you up, you can count on that. That’s why victims are trapped.”
What Right Looks Like
The break from trafficking came not from a dramatic moment of disclosure but from a quiet act of desperation. Alone for a moment with Baruti’s computer, Jessika logged into her mother’s email account and deleted everything—then composed one message:
“It’s me. I love you. You’re never going to want meback. Don’t worry about me anymore.”
Her parents brought that draft to a detective. The IP address was traced to Backpage.com postings. Meanwhile a Bellevue Police Department officer who had encountered Jessika during a shoplifting run-in had quietly been building a case—obtaining warrants, confirming her identity from old Facebook posts, connecting the dots to where Baruti was advertising her online. He reached out to the Seattle Police Department Vice Unit.
Washington Detective Bill Guyer
Detective Bill Guyer got the call at home, tired after a long day, and by his own admission took it with a bad attitude. What happened next changed everything.
At the hotel, the undercover detective who met Jessika had no shoes on, which was strange enough for her to drop her guard. When they reached the room, he casually opened a drawer. There she could see his badge and gun.
“Jessika, we found you,” he said. She hadn’t heard her real name in months. This startled her, but she fell back into her trained persona. Then more officers arrived—and Guyer walked in.
While wearing lingerie, Jessika was calling Guyer every name she had learned on the street. He moved her handcuffs to the front. He draped his jacket over her shoulders. And once in his vehicle, he asked—asked—before reaching across her to buckle her seatbelt.
“I still remember him making sure I was comfortable—and his simple acts of humanity,” Jessika says. “Like I was a person. Like I was a kid. Like I was fragile.”
She kept throwing insults. He kept his composure—not in an aloof way, but with the quiet confidence of someone who could see past her performance to the child underneath. “At one point I told her, ‘Look, I can’t be all those things you’re calling me,’” Guyer recalls. “‘Pick one or two and stick with them. Otherwise you’re just losing your impact.’”
Talking the Talk
Years after Jessika’s rescue, Guyer came across a line in a business leadership book that stopped him cold: “People respond more to how you feel about them than what you say.” He’s used it ever since, in every trafficking case, in every conversation with younger officers.
His practical guidance: slow down, go at the victim’s pace, and start with basic needs—food, warmth, a jacket—before questions. He describes swinging through a McDonald’s drive-through at midnight, not because it’s ideal, but because something shifts when you sit and eat together. “These girls are not eating well, not sleeping well,” he says. “Start with the necessities. If they’re obstinate, they’re probably tired and cold. Try to go at their pace.”
Guyer remembers that night not as a hero moment but as a reminder of what is possible when an officer decides, even while tired, to actually care. “I’d like to say that I’m that way every day,” he says. “Some days I’m not. Two in the morning, dealing with a ton of things, you just want to go home. Then I wonder why an interview went nowhere. Because they could tell that I wasn’t into it.”
Phillips adds a case study he returns to often in training: a 14-year- old trafficking victim who was the most hostile witness he had ever encountered. With patience and time away from the trafficker’s control, she became one of the best. Her testimony led to 12 felony convictions, including 11 buyers. “Don’t let a rough first encounter define the whole case,” he says. “Get what you can the day of recovery. Then do follow-up interviews.”
Advocates Make an Impact
Recovery, Jessika says, didn’t happen in a single moment. It happened because of people who stayed in the process long after the arrest was made. A victim advocate named Noel—herself a survivor of 15 years of trafficking—gave Jessika something she hadn’t found elsewhere: being understood without judgment.
When Jessika said she’d run again if sent home, Noel listened. Within days she had arranged placement in a group home with other trafficking survivors—a soft landing for someone who had been running at full speed.
Chance points to embedded advocates as one of the most systemic changes law enforcement can make. The Phoenix Police Department now assigns one directly to its Human Exploitation and Trafficking Unit. “Even if a victim doesn’t want to talk to law enforcement, the advocate can take them confidentially aside and talk to them about getting resources,” she says. “That is huge.”
The threat landscape keeps shifting. Chance notes the average entry age into sex trafficking has fallen to 13, and she recently helped recover an 11-year-old. Groomers no longer lurk near shelters; they work social media and online gaming platforms. Her book, Talk to Them, was written to bring parents into the conversation before law enforcement ever needs to be. Be the Difference
Jessika’s trafficker was the first person convicted under Washington state’s commercial sex abuse of a minor statute. He received 26.5 years and was required to register as a sex offender. Jessika testified in two separate trials, helping put away not only him but a man who had posed as a police officer to assault her and others. And in 2018 she became part of the effort to bring down Backpage.com (detailed in the documentary I Am Jane Doe).
She and her mother now consult for the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children and volunteer with its Team HOPE program, supporting young survivors of trafficking, sexual abuse material, and sextortion. Both are also AATTAP-NCJTC Associates who bring their family’s story to training rooms whenever possible. And by the end of each session, Phillips says, “everyone wants to be Bill [Guyer].” Guyer attended Jessika’s wedding. He is the godfather of her eldest daughter. “You can be the hero in someone’s story, even through what can seem like a small action,” Phillips tells officers. “See the kid in front of you instead of just another case.”
“My faith in law enforcement has never wavered,” Jessika says. “I know that if you were faced with a situation like I was put in, you would make the difference for someone. I can see that just by you being present.”
What the Research—and Jessika—Want You to Know
Consider the key takeaways for law enforcement from AATTAP-NCJTC child sex trafficking training.
There is no such thing as a safe runaway. Every missing child should be considered a missing, endangered child.
Notice what is in front of you. Age disparity. Inappropriate clothing for the weather or situation. Visible condoms. These are not unrelated details. Connect the dots.
NCIC entry is not optional. Trafficking survivor Jessika Svendgard was held for six hours at a police station while officers tried to determine if she was missing—and never identified her, because her case had never been entered into the database. The trespass paperwork she walked out with became proof of a false identity. A missed entry can close every door.
Separate the child from the adult. A girl will not tell you the truth with her trafficker standing next to her. Find a reason, however low-key, to speak with her alone. She may not volunteer anything, but the dynamic shifts the moment he is out of earshot.
Grooming looks like love. Traffickers target children from foster care, neglect, and abuse—kids for whom the trafficker may be the first consistent source of attention and affection. “It doesn’t always look scary,” Jessika says. “It doesn’t always look forced.” Understanding why a child is loyal to their exploiter is the first step to reaching them.
Go at their pace, not yours. Patrol interviews are often rapid-fire, says Special Agent Blaine Phillips. Trafficking victims require a different rhythm. Ask less. Listen more. Follow their lead. You may only get 30% of the story the first time, but that is still progress.
They can read you. Act accordingly. “These girls are expert at reading people,” says Detective Bill Guyer. “If you go in thinking, ‘let’s just get this one over with’—that opinion is going to come out.” Victims will not open up to someone who doesn’t care, and they will know immediately whether you do. Your attitude is part of your technique.
Start with basic needs, not questions. Food. Warmth. A jacket. Something to drink. Before the interview, before the paperwork, meet the basic needs first. Guyer describes pulling through a McDonald’s drive-through at midnight not because it’s protocol, but because something shifts when you sit and eat together. The walls come down.
Avoid ‘gotcha!’ moments. Harsh treatment confirms every suspicion a victim has about law enforcement. But yielding too easily produces whatever answer gets them out the door fastest. When something doesn’t add up, don’t confront it; note it. Say something like, “That doesn’t really make sense based on what you told me earlier. We’ll come back to it.” She will know you caught her in a lie without feeling like less of a person. Trust builds.
An embedded advocate changesoutcomes. Even when a victim won’t speak to law enforcement, an advocate assigned to the unit can engage them on another level, connecting them to housing, transportation, and services without first requiring cooperation, notes Detective Heidi Chance. The Phoenix Police Department now assigns one directly to the unit. It works.
Go beyond the victim’s testimony. Victims recant. Traffickers control their story. Corroborate everything you can: cell phones, computers, hotel receipts, GPS records, surveillance footage, bank records, social media activity, medical records. The more evidence you build independent of the victim’s testimony, the stronger the case—and the less she has to face him alone.
Know the Numbers
Missing-child data is not trafficking data, but for law enforcement, it is often where trafficking first appears. "Missing doesn't always mean trafficked but trafficked often starts with missing," says AATTAP-NCJTC Curriculum Manager Cathy Delapaz.
In 2025, the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) assisted with more than 32,000 reports of missing children. Of those, 1 in 7 were likely victims of child sex trafficking.
Most victims of child sex trafficking are forced into it from the ages of 12 to 14.
323,767 missing person records involving juveniles under 18 were entered into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database in 2025, accounting for roughly 65% of all missing person entries nationwide; 94.9% were coded as runaways. By year's end, 21,487 juveniles were still listed as actively missing.
Roughly 74% of missing child/runaway cases reported to NCMEC in 2025 were ages 15 to 17. This demographic is targeted most aggressively by traffickers for "grooming" before the physical trafficking begins.
17% of the reports of children missing from child welfare to NCMEC in 2025 were likely victims of child sex trafficking.
In 2025, NCMEC received more than 113,500 reports of possible child sex trafficking, a 323% increase from 2024.
Boys are as likely as girls to be sex trafficked. However, they are less likely to be identified and reported.
A note about the data: The REPORT Act's strengthened standards give NCMEC a more accurate picture of online child sex trafficking. Prior to the Act in 2023, platforms submitted 8,480 CyberTipline reports. By 2025, the first full year of implementation, reports surged to 105,877, a 1,100% increase, demonstrating the profound impact of expanded reporting requirements.
Jessika, thank you for your sincere and painful testimony regarding your story. I can't imagine how disappointing it must have been to have interacted with law enforcement at that time and knowing that we had failed you. But know that there are those of us that are dedicated in helping people just like you. You and your testimony today will help those of us that are here for victims like you. Please stay the course and keep the faith.
Chart Your Course
AATTAP offers a variety of courses to bolster your knowledge of child sex trafficking (CST) investigations. Jessika Svendgard often provides her survivor perspective during the one- and two-day classroom or live online instructor-led courses.
CST Investigations: Strategies to Increase Prosecutions2 days; classroom or live online instructor-led
Learn about CST’s complexities, mastering trauma-informed victim interviews and strategic suspect interrogations to navigate legal hurdles. This course is valuable for law enforcement, system advocates and prosecution.
CST for First Responders1 day; classroom or live online instructor-led
Learn to deconstruct CST incidents and identify common encounter scenarios. Master victim-centered contact practices, secure vital initial evidence, and develop actionable response plans.
CST for Law Enforcement1 day; classroom or live online instructor-led
Investigating child sex trafficking requires understanding the business model and the roles of traffickers, accomplices, and buyers. This training examines the evidence needed to build effective cases and details the distinct interview strategies for victims, abusers, and traffickers.
CST and 911 Communicators: Recognize and Rescuewebinar on demand
911 telecommunicators are the first responders in child sex trafficking. This webinar explores CST’s hidden nature, teaching dispatchers to identify relevant calls and take critical steps to ensure victim rescue and informed officer dispatch.
A CPS Perspective: Missing and Trafficked, Detecting CST Without Disclosurewebinar on demand
Child Protective Services (CPS) workers: explore your jurisdiction in trafficking cases and why children go missing. Learn to identify indicators, navigate non-disclosure, and collaborate with law enforcement to protect and support recovered victims effectively.
The CST Suspect Interview: Obtaining the Confessionwebinar on demand
Confront manipulative child sex traffickers in the interview room. Learn to recognize personality types, dismantle defenses, and secure confessions. Master techniques that turn their own words into evidence to hold them accountable for exploitation.
CST Investigations: 5 Things to Strengthen Law Enforcement and Advocacy Partnerships webinar on demand
Balance law enforcement and advocacy in CST investigations. Explore diverse perspectives, identify five core values for successful partnerships, and hear a victim’s account of the life-changing impact of collaborative, advocacy-led investigation teams.
CST and First Responders —Part 1: Identifying and Securing Early-Stage Evidence webinar on demand
Successful CST investigations rely on identifying and preserving critical early-stage evidence. Learn to locate key evidence, apply proper collection methods, and strengthen decision-making to disrupt exploitation and support successful prosecutions.
CST and First Responders —Part 2: Critical First Contact With Victims webinar on demand
First contact shapes the trajectory of child sex trafficking investigations. Learn to define victim-centered engagement, recognize trauma indicators, and master approaches that build trust, support recovery, and ensure successful prosecutions while minimizing re-traumatization.
Strategic Victim Interviewing in CST Cases webinar on demand
Differentiate field-based and investigative child sex trafficking interviews, adapt strategies for unplanned encounters, apply a four-phase response framework, and use trauma-informed practices that protect victims, preserve evidence, and address trafficker-related public safety threats.
Ohio law enforcement authorities, child advocates, and family members who have or had missing loved ones are teaming up on a newlycreated Missing Persons Working Group. Ohio Governor MikeDeWine tasked the group with reviewing the state’s resources and response to cases of missing children and adults. “The ultimate goal here is to bring more missing people home safely,” DeWine said. Led by the Ohio Department of Public Safety, the group will analyze how disappearances are investigated and suggest improvements, as well as study database usage and law enforcement training, and hear from family members with missing loved ones. Group appointee Jonisa Cook, whose 6-year-old son with autism went missing before being found deceased in a pond, said her mission is to turn a tragedy into something positive. “That’s what’s getting me going every day, knowing that I could potentially help someone else, potentially help another family,” she said.
By Denise Gee Peacock
Michael Jude Nixon’s middle name is his mother’s homage to Saint Jude, “the patron saint of hope and hopeless causes,” Nixon says. “She had a rough time during her pregnancy with me, and found comfort in prayer,” he says. “Thankfully everything turned out OK.”
And thankfully for those in his hometown of Beaumont, Texas, Nixon has devoted his life to serving people in need of hope—people facing hopeless causes.
“My family taught me to recognize a higher purpose in life,” says Nixon, who retired five years ago as a detective with the Beaumont Police Department, where he worked for almost 16 years and was the department’s AMBER Alert Coordinator.
Nixon now serves in two broader-ranging law enforcement capacities. Since 2020 he has held the role of Region 12 Missing Person Alert Coordinator for the Texas Department of Public Safety. (Region 12, comprising six counties in the Beaumont area, is home to about 500,000 people in southeastern Texas near southern Louisiana.)
Since 2020, Nixon has worked as Assistant Director and Training Coordinator for the Lamar Institute of Technology (LIT) Regional Police Academy in Beaumont. And on the national front, he recently joined Team Adam, a seasoned group of law enforcement professionals tapped for rapid deployment by the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children to investigate missing child cases.
Nixon’s path into law enforcement followed a decade of doing manual labor for the City of Beaumont.
The first half of that chapter was working in water maintenance for five years, and for the next five “dealing with alligators, snakes, you name it” as an animal control officer. The arduous, all-hours work “was difficult, but important,” he says. “It just didn’t pay enough to help me make ends meet” for his young family, and kept him from home a lot.
Some friends at the Beaumont Police Department encouraged him to join the BPD.
But then came Hurdle One. “Initially, I was provided a job offer, but it was rescinded after they learned I had a GED instead of a high school diploma.” (Nixon earned a GED at 18 after enlisting in the U.S. Army Reserve.) Undaunted, he returned to high school at age 32 and received that diploma. That allowed him to train at LIT and join the BPD in 2004.
Next came Hurdle Two: navigating the traumas associated with crimes against children—from child abuse to sex trafficking cases, which he was responsible for investigating for much of his BPD career.
The way he managed to cope (see “Take 5” section below) now informs his Regional Police Academy training work at LIT. It also has spurred him to continue expanding his horizons for both personal and professional growth. In December 2023 he earned his Associate of Science degree in criminal justice from LIT, and currently is pursuing a bachelor’s degree in the discipline from Lamar University.
We recently caught up with Nixon so we could learn more about his work experiences—and also glean his advice that others could apply to their work lives.
How did your world change after becoming a police officer? Working for the water department and as an animal control officer prepared me well. I saw the downside of humanity in those roles, and it was humbling. That makes you a more empathetic person. I was able to carry that over into law enforcement. I realized that everybody I encountered was somebody’s child, somebody’s parent, somebody’s loved one. I credit that to my mom’s influence. She taught me to be nice to people, even if you can’t do anything else to help.
Michael Nixon and fellow Texan John Graham, a law enforcement veteran and Region 2 AMBER Alert Coordinator, share mutual respect. “If my child was abducted, Mike is who I’d want leading the investigation,” Graham says.
What were some challenges you faced in your law enforcement work? Earning people’s trust, for one. Also, getting them to talk. Many small-town communities that have been mistreated or ignored by law enforcement have built up a wall, a mentality of ‘us versus them.’ That wall has to be continually torn down by both cops and citizens, Black and White alike. That’s because any national incident of police brutality will overshadow hundreds if not thousands of positive incidents, so it’s an uphill battle that we have to learn from. It doesn’t do us any good to be overzealous or condescending. As my mother always said, ‘You can catch more flies with honey.’ And when someone extends an olive branch, take it. I made an effort to go to park events and parades, to meet people on their level. We may not be welcomed at first—or the second time or third time—but we shouldn’t give up.
How did that affect cases involving missing children? When a community doesn’t trust law enforcement they’ll think they can solve a problem faster and more effectively on their own—of not getting the police involved. That’s especially true because most AMBER Alerts we handle are family-related and not stranger abductions, so people figure an outsider won’t be much help. I’ve had to work hard to convince them that I’m on their side. One challenge comes when children have been lured into sex trafficking. You have about four seconds to make a positive impression before they close their minds to you. Most have been told not to trust law enforcement; to be afraid that a cop will victimize them.
Do you cross paths with some of the children you helped over the years? I see a lot of them quite frequently, but very few know who I am. That’s by design; our child advocacy center is their true liaison. But their parents tend to know who I am. Often they’re people I grew up with. And sometimes they’ve come to me for guidance. I feel good when I can help.
Take 5: Ways to keep stress in check
Dealing with the disturbing realities of child protection work is a major stressor for law enforcement. “So many of us compartmentalize all the things we see,” Michael Nixon says. “We tell everybody that we’re fine when we’re not.” Here is some of his hard-won wisdom.
Share your feelings with a trusted friend or professional.“Around the time of my retirement, everything I’d dealt with over the years was causing me to have sleepless nights, to feel anxious. And I’m not ashamed to admit that I decided to talk with a therapist. He helped me see I was finally ‘man enough’ to admit the issues I was having. That’s why I tell our police academy cadets, ‘If you’re not feeling well, talk to someone,’ Nixon says. “It also helps to talk with colleagues who’ve had the same experiences as you.”
Leave work at work.“One of the best decisions I ever made was never talking with my family about any bad things that I had seen during the day. The boogeyman is not welcome at my house.”
Do a wellness check—on yourself.“Everyone—but especially those in law enforcement—should practice self-care,” Nixon says. “Find a way to step back, take a deep breath, and decompress. For instance, in an active shooter situation, we may run on adrenaline until there’s a break in the action. That’s when we’re supposed to check ourselves for wounds we may not be aware of. The same goes for investigating crimes against children. Check yourself every 12 hours to ensure you’re OK.”
Fortify your body and mind. “I found strength, and stress relief, by going to the gym each day, or working on some property I own in the country, clearing trees and that sort of thing. This kind of exercise can make you stronger physically and mentally.”
Don’t be afraid to cry.“Shedding tears is a body’s way of cleansing itself after a traumatic situation,” Nixon says. “Whenever you need some relief, find an empty office, or go sit in your car, and do what you need to do to lift that weight from your shoulders. Doing that will help you move forward.”
“Most people will experience a traumatic incident maybe five to seven times in their entire life. Meantime, a cop may experience a traumatic incident five to seven times a shift.”
Michael Nixon
A Special Message from Jim Walters, AMBER Alert Training and Technical Assistance Program Administrator
Jim Walters
It seems like almost daily we hear stories about teens who go missing, found as victims of trafficking and exploitation or assaulted and even murdered by a predator. While those cases may generate headlines or brief flurries of media interest, what is sometimes missed is how their cases began and how we as first responders, call takers, and investigators approached their case from the onset.
All too often those cases began as a report of a missing child who was either characterized by the family from the start as voluntarily missing or whose case was approached as a probable runaway by law enforcement. Sadly, many of those we “thought” were runaways or were voluntarily missing were actually abducted, lured away or were not allowed to return by a predator. Regardless of how they went missing, the bottom line is that their cases did not receive the same degree of attention or investigative resources that a reported abduction or endangered missing classification might have prompted.
CREATING A CULTURAL CHANGE
In order to properly address the issue of runaways and voluntary missing in terms of how we respond and investigate, we have to create a cultural change in law enforcement. It’s a fact that most officers respond to dozens or even hundreds of reports of runaways each year. In the vast majority of these cases the child is reunited with their family or comes home on his or her own. It is easy to see how we can become complacent to the fact that there are children in that group that will never come home without our help.
When I was a young police officer, I remember how we handled domestic disturbances. The police officer was called on to be both a protector and a counselor. I still remember my first “DV” call and watching my supervisor handle the situation by driving the husband (who was in my mind at least, clearly the aggressor) to a local motel and telling him that if he came back to the house that night, he was going to go to jail. Of course, he came back, of course he assaulted his wife and of course he went to jail. It took an outcry from the public and media, litigation in the courts and finally case law to make us rethink how we dealt with family violence.
Fortunately, it’s now second nature to young recruits to identify the primary aggressors, make arrests, seek protective orders and provide referrals to victim services. We had a cultural change and it was for the better. The same thing happened with seat belts, open containers and child safety seats.
It is time that we had the same cultural shift in regards to runaways. Instead of approaching the report of a voluntary missing young person as a delinquency matter, let’s teach recruits and veterans alike to approach these cases from the standpoint of protecting the child. The actions taken by first responders and call takers are the most important factors in protecting the missing child regardless of how they went missing. We know from over 100 case reviews conducted by the AMBER Alert Training and Technical Assistance Program that in cases where first responders failed to properly assess the circumstances, secure crime scenes, missed evidence or suspect information; the success rate in terms of successfully recovering the missing child plummeted.
An estimated 71 percent of runaways are thought to have been endangered during their runaway episode. Factors such as substance dependency, use of hard drugs, sexual or physical abuse, presence in a place where criminal activity was occurring, or because of their extremely young age (13 years old or younger) place even the voluntary runaway at risk.1
Every runaway case should be considered in terms of potential threats facing the child, not the acts of the child. First responders and call takers need to determine if there are elements present that suggest the child is running from abuse in the home, or if they have been lured away by a predator through use of technology or grooming. Were they abducted or are they voluntarily missing but at risk to the many dangers that threaten the runaway child? If we looked at it from the perspective of threats to the child, rather than delinquency by the child, we would see an improvement in how we approach these cases from the onset.
Some key takeaways have come forth from more than 15 roundtables and listening sessions conducted by the AATTAP with surviving family members of missing, abducted and murdered children. These mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters and others are sharing what they learned when their child went missing.
Listen to the parents. They know their child and if they tell you the child is not a runaway, is at risk, or that their missing episode is out of character; listen to them and investigate, analyze and assess as though a crime has occurred; or until you know for a fact the child is safe.
Always dispatch an officer. This is especially relevant to a first responder’s mindset in cases where the family or child are known to law enforcement. It may seem like the report from a family member or other party can be taken over the phone, but this is a dangerous practice because it prevents the officer from putting eyes on the location where the child lives or was last seen. It is impossible to conduct a true assessment of the risk to the child without knowing what clues or warning signs you are missing if not there in person.
Always ask to search the home. Even if the reporting party indicates the child went missing from another location or didn’t return home on time, we always ask permission to search the home for clues that might show how or when the child left the home and under what circumstances.
In one case, officers responding to a “routine” runaway report asked to search the missing teenager’s room and found information that showed she had left the home to meet an individual who was determined to be a registered sex offender. Officers were able to intercept the child and take the child predator into custody before she was harmed. Had they not searched her room, there is no telling what may have befallen that child.
Know how to access, analyze and utilize digital evidence and social networking. More and more we see cases where children are lured from home by an individual they meet on line. Often the true identity of this person is unknown by the child before they are in the grasp of a predator. Social networking, cell technology and other digital evidence techniques can often prove the difference between victimization and a safe recovery.
Err on the side of protecting the child. When in doubt about whether the child is endangered or is in the midst of a voluntary runaway episode, go with protecting the child first.
Yes, there will be cases where we put a lot of work into recovering a child who is simply angry with a parent, hanging with friends after hours or even engaged in delinquent behavior. All that extra work is nothing in comparison to the pain and trauma that comes with that one child we miss, that one time we don’t issue the alert, call out additional resources or put our best efforts into the investigation, only to find out later that we failed them by using old thinking and old approaches.
FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW TO IMPROVE RESPONSE TO REPORTS OF RUNAWAYS AND VOLUNTARY MISSING CHILDREN, DOWNLOAD RESOURCES AND ATTEND TRAINING.
Classroom and online training in investigative strategies provided free of charge by AATTAP and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention https://www.amberadvocate. org/training-resources/